Comment on page
Canceling Requests

Many applications transfer data using HTTP requests. One feature of HTTP requests is that they can be cancelled.
As a rule of thumb, for each request that you make in your application, there will always be one situation where you will want to cancel that request to prevent bugs.
Why do it
Canceling requests prevents race conditions. A race condition occurs when you have two requests in flight at the same time, but your code is written such that one must resolve before the other. As you may know, requests can resolve in any order, which leads to the bugs.
A common pattern we've seen in Redux applications is this:
1.whenever a request completes, an action is dispatched
2.a reducer responds to that action, updating the state
3.a view renders using the latest data from the state
This pattern isn't bad – it's great! You just need to be aware that it can lead to bugs when requests aren't cancelled.
Let's look at two examples that demonstrate the problem.
Example: A Typeahead
Consider a "typeahead" component that allows a user to type to search for books. Even when the user's input is debounced, there are situations where two (or more) active requests can be in flight. The user can type, wait a moment for a request to send, then type one key to fire off a second request. If the backend response time is slower than the debounce time, then two search requests will be in flight at once.
Because the requests can complete in any order, it is possible that the user's earliest search results will return after their latest search results. If your code is written such that the last-received search results are displayed, then that can lead to the wrong search results being shown.
Canceling a previous request resolves this problem, as it means that only one search request will ever be in flight at a time, and it will be the user's most recent search. If you're using an action creator that returns a native XMLHttpRequest object, such as the action creator from Redux Resource XHR, then your code may look like this:
class Typeahead extends Component {
  searchBooks: function(query) {
    if (this.searchBooksRequest) {
      this.searchBooksRequest.abort();
    }
​
    this.searchBooksRequest = this.props.searchBooks(query);
  }
}
Another tip is to cancel any requests when the component unmounts. If the search results aren't needed when the component unmounts, then letting a request complete will still update your state tree, which can cause unnecessary renders in your application. Canceling requests in componentWillUnmount might look something like:
class Typeahead extends Component {
  componentWillUnmount: function() {
    if (this.searchBooksRequest) {
      this.searchBooksRequest.abort();
    }
  }
}
Example: Pagination
Consider a page of an application that displays books. Often, long lists of resources will be paginated, and a user can move between the pages by clicking a "next" or "previous" button.
A race condition can occur when the user clicks the buttons too fast, or when the backend service is slow. If your view layer renders out the results of the latest response, then it's possible that they could see the results from the wrong page.
Similar to the search example above, ensuring that only a single page of data is being fetched at once is the solution.
The solution is the same as the typeahead example:
1.cancel any existing page-change requests before starting a new one
2.consider if it makes sense to cancel the request when the component
unmounts
A common feature of these bugs is that they depend on unreliable network conditions, so they don't usually come up in a development environment. This makes them easy to ignore, but they're still worth protecting against.
How to do it
Typically, applications do not need to inform the user when a request is aborted. Accordingly, Redux Resource does not track if a request is in an aborted state. Instead, we encourage you to set the request status back to "IDLE" when the request is canceled.
For a read request, this may look something like:
import { actionTypes } from 'redux-resource';
​
// You will need to determine that the request was aborted;
// different libraries have different systems for doing this
let requestWasAborted;
​
if (requestWasAborted) {
  dispatch({
    type: actionTypes.READ_RESOURCES_IDLE,
    ...otherActionAttributes
  })
}
Note: If your application requires tracking the aborted status of a request, you can write a plugin to add support for additional action types.
Note: We understand that some users want their action type names to reflect the action that is being performed, rather than the result of the action. We agree that this is a good practice to follow. If you do, too, it may irritate you that there is no READ_RESOURCES_ABORT action type. This is omitted in an effort to keep the surface area of Redux Resource small, since that action would behave the same as READ_RESOURCES_IDLE.
Canceling requests in popular libraries
There are many different tools developers use to make requests. In this section, we will go through how to cancel requests using some of the most common tools.
XMLHttpRequest
In browsers, the native way to cancel a request is to call the abort method on an XMLHttpRequest.
const myRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
myRequest.open('GET', 'books');
​
myRequest.abort();
xhr
The xhr library simplifies the creation of XHR objects. Because it returns a native XMLHttpRequest object, canceling requests with xhr is the same as when you use the native XMLHttpRequest constructor.
import xhr from 'xhr';
​
const request = xhr.get('/books/23', (err, res) => {
  if (req.aborted) {
    console.log('Request cancelled');
  }
});
​
request.abort();
​Redux Resource XHR for Redux Resource uses xhr for requests. The action creator exported by this library returns a native XHR object, so you can use the abort method to cancel those requests.
fetch
The native fetch method is a tool for making requests that returns a Promise. Native Promises cannot be cancelled (yet), but you can get around this limitation by "ignoring" the server response.
One way to do this is to create a function that you return from your action creators. Then, only fire the "success" action as long as that function is not called.
Although there are benefits to actually canceling the request, this solution will avoid the race condition bugs described in this guide.
axios
​axios is a Promise-based approach to HTTP requests that supports cancellation. It uses a system of canceling Promises called "Cancel Tokens," which is based off of a withdrawn cancelable Promises proposal.
To see how to cancel axios requests, refer to the axios documentation.
Bluebird
​Bluebird is Promise implementation that supports cancellation using an onCancel method.
Refer to the Bluebird documentation for specifics on the onCancel method.
Observables in RxJS
​RxJS is a Reactive Programming library for async code using Observables. It includes Observable.ajax() for HTTP requests and supports cancellation by calling subscription.unsubscribe(), or using something like .takeUntil().
If you happen to be using redux-observable, refer to that library's documentation for a recipe for request cancellation.
Alternatives
You don't always need to cancel requests. Two other options are:
1.Prevent the user from performing an action more than once. For instance, in the search example, you could prevent the user from typing if a search of theirs is already in flight. And in the pagination example, you can disable the "next" and "previous" buttons until the new page loads. In these examples, this approach is clearly a subpar experience, but sometimes it does make sense. For instance, disabling a "Delete" button for a book once the user clicks it once, or disabling a "Buy" button after the user confirms a purchase.
2.You could write code to keep track of which request's response is the correct one to display. We generally find it to be simpler to cancel requests instead.
There may be other options, too, and different approaches may make more sense to you based on the situation.
Forms
Unauthorized Responses
Last modified 5yr ago